dcsimg
 
 
 
 
 

Facebook and Netflix Test Appetite For Change

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

by Samuel Greengard

The chorus of moans you heard over the last two weeks was the sound of 800 million people coping with yet another round of changes on Facebook. It seems like every few months, Facebook rolls out an interface update or some new way of doing things and, on cue, users recoil in horror.

We live in an era of radical and ongoing change. Yesterday's cool, leading edge feature is tomorrow's yawner. Remember, dot matrix printers and 1200-baud modems were once big breakthroughs.

It isn't only Facebook dialing up changes. Mozilla, the producer of the Firefox browser, has embraced a rapid release program that has some developers and users revolting. Twitter and other sites continue to evolve at a rapid rate as well.

I'm willing to wager that if Facebook made a series of changes that led users right back to the starting point several months from now, people would squawk about the same version of the of site that they previously railed against changing. It's human nature to resist change. For most of us, it's hard-wired into our brains.

Yet it's crucial to differentiate between changes that drive a product forward and those that take a step backward. I honestly don't know if every change in Facebook or Twitter is a good thing but, in aggregate, they seem to improve the user experience. If these sites don't keep up--Facebook is now facing intense pressure from Google+--they eventually become creaky. Ask MySpace.

On the other hand, the jury is out on Netflix. I'm having a tough time understanding how dividing a company into two--one that sends DVDs by mail and the other that streams--is anything less than anti-innovation. My queues are now separate? My ratings are separate? I have to pay separately? Hard to see how all that works to my benefit.

But change is here to stay and today's digital technology ensures that the pace will further accelerate in the months and years ahead. Just keep telling yourself: An unwillingness to change and a desire to change for the sake of change lead to the same outcome: you risk falling behind the curve and becoming an asterisk.

 
 
 

2 Comments for "Facebook and Netflix Test Appetite For Change"

  • Tyllannon October 05, 2011 11:16 am

    Oh, come on, Samuel Greengard. What? Did you write this just to prove you can slap a keyboard? Ed Cone, does Baseline really need filler? The on-going gripes are Not about Change. "Change Happens." Big Whoop. I wouldn't be commenting without an ability to adapt. Customers are getting sick & tired of being treated like cattle. Only being told after-the-fact that their products must mutate for the corporate good is getting really old. Corporations, like politicians, are drifting further and further from their clients. And that, more so than trying to keep up with ABC Inc., will kill the share price, and hamstring innovation. Facebook pushes changes in a vacuum - if they consider customer input there is no proof. Netflix pushed it's changes simply because it could. And I hope the backlash demonstrates to Reed Hastings that customers still have a choice - to spend, or not to spend.

  • Anon October 05, 2011 9:02 am

    One of the parts that keep being left out of the equation is the end user. IT is notorious for not asking what changes people want to see. Maybe if Netflix and Facebook were a little more in touch with their end users, their roll outs wouldn't face so much complaining and people would embrace the change, not have it shoved down their throats.

Leave a Comment