iPad Wins on Security
by Samuel Greengard Once upon a time, all personal computers were standalone devices that didn't connect to anything. And when I say anything, I mean anything. If you're 30 or younger, I know that understanding this concept is extraordinarily challenging. But, really, there was a time when devices were islands unto themselves. I don't think anyone wants to go back there. Mailing 8-inch or 5-inch floppy disks and waiting three days for someone to get it was a total pain. But, in retrospect, there were certain advantages to this approach. Most notably the lack of security problems that exist in today's interconnected world. The Internet, USB, FireWire, card slots and DVD drives make it ridiculously easy to lose or steal credit card numbers or offload The Secret Sauce. That's one of the reasons why devices like the iPad are so interesting -- no USB port and no physical way to get data off the device. That is, unless you want to hand scribble whatever is visible on the screen onto a scrap of paper or snap photos from your smartphone. There is no perfect security solution, but the ability to monitor and control what data moves onto and off a device over the air--using mobile device management tools to enforce policies and block illegal activities--is actually a step forward. Apple, as usual, has created a brilliant interface, along with superior usability that has the entire world going gaga. It has created a device that is excellent at delivering the promise of tablet computing. But there's another reason why formerly Apple-averse CIOs are adopting iPads at an rapid clip, with close to 90 percent of Fortune 100 companies are testing or using iPads, according to industry estimates: They're more secure than their rivals. While Android and RIM Playbook devices offer USB ports and MicroSD card slots--and marketers tout this as an advantage--a couple of CIOs I've spoken to recently are thrilled to return to the port-free days of yesteryear. They're even willing to accept lower powered devices with less memory and pay a somewhat higher price as a trade-off for simpler security. We're conditioned to want more and more features on the devices we use. Almost every hardware and software vendor caters to this desire with the promise of greater flexibility, versatility and agility. But, as Apple as clearly proven, the ability to go backward can actually be a huge step forward. |
Comments (6)
These sound like great pearls of wisdom. Come to think of it, all I hear when I speak to any enterprise IT dept support people is the whining about how Apple's products are so "controlling" and how Microsoft products are so... "open sourcey" like. Really? (Cost of course is the other big thing they whine about)
I tend to think Apple should have been in the enterprise business all along, and Microsoft in the personal PC business. In fact, it is just the opposite !!
Posted by Udaya Padakandla,MD | September 20, 2011 11:52 AM
The good old days of sneaker-net. And we should not forget when the first steps outlined for securing a computer in the DoD Orange Book was to disconnect the computer from the network. Not to point fingers, but to point out that anything that increases the ease of remote access concurrently decreases the overall security of the device.
Posted by Mitchell Gorsha | September 21, 2011 9:38 AM
How is the security of the iPad affected when you connect the optional USB/SD adapter? For about $30 you can add this potential security hole to your iPad too.
Posted by Mike | September 21, 2011 12:46 PM
Physical security aside these devices are still not enterprise friendly. How about the coming iCloud that will take away the need for any physical connection by syncing all your documents from all your apple devices out to the cloud that are then accessible by other devices including your iPod, etc. Fraught with user error an dmixng of corpoarte and personal data if you ask me. User credentialign is still an dissue as well.
Posted by dem | September 21, 2011 1:01 PM
Mike:
It's simple, don't plug it in. You can always choose to walk off the cliff if you so desire but I would say that if you want to avoid the disasterous affects of gravity, then don't!
Posted by Robert | September 22, 2011 9:54 AM
Come on, this is really the reason why CIO/CTOs would accept these devices. If it is then the CIO/CTOs who believe this solves part of their security problems should be looking for a new job!
Posted by John | September 22, 2011 10:37 AM