Service Economy Lacks Service
Samuel Greengard Self-service has morphed into no service. In the mid '90s, when the Web went commercial, it was a remarkable new channel for providing information and helping customers. Now it seems like it has devolved into the primary channel--and sometimes the only channel--for too many organizations. It's hardly a bulletin that companies want to I'm not opposed to using websites and self-service. In many cases I prefer handling things myself. But I bristle at the concept of getting sloughed off to websites for everything. It's like the old IVR loop with no "0" option revisited. I repeatedly come across companies that don't even provide a customer service phone number at their site! And if companies are a problem, government and colleges are far worse. There's little incentive for service at these organizations. I have a friend who's researching career opportunities and looking to go back to school. Every time she calls a college with a few questions she is referred to the website. It seems that nobody can take a minute or two to provide an answer. Employees are getting hit with this too. The few remaining HR employees have become nothing more than human traffic pylons that direct callers to their website. Several friends have complained recently that they can no longer get answers to their questions by calling in and speaking to a person. Perhaps this is the real world fallout from the Google effect. The problem is that you get information but not always answers at websites. Sometimes it's necessary to have a human available who can connect the dots and solve a problem. Otherwise, a task that should take 5 minutes winds up taking 3 or 6 hours. Of course, there's a cynical side of me that says that these organizations don't care. It's not their time or their problem. In fact, a lot of organizations are so obsessed with cutting costs they've completely lost sight of the big picture. Worse, they're using the wrong metrics and measures to track results. You can hit all your metrics and still fail. I wonder if CEOs or other top executives ever test their own websites and businesses? What a concept. Previously: I want my travel agent! |
Comments (4)
Your comments are spot on. In my opinion technology enhances an organizations overall strategy for customer service by ofering different channels to customers to get and receive information, but it should not replace the overall service strategy. In the end customers still like the option of human interaction if needed and we need to remember all business is a people business.
Posted by Cameron Chehreh | August 16, 2011 7:30 AM
"...they've completely lost site of..." -- did you mean "...they've completely lost sight of..."??
Posted by Lynn Schmelzer | August 16, 2011 11:18 AM
You've hit on one of the major pains of modern living. The only thing worse than wasting time going through useless phone trees is uninformed or unempowered customer support reps.
Some companies are so aggressive at blocking customers from getting help, I'm convinced they do it on purpose. It's as if they see customers as an inconvenience or annoyance rather than the reason for the company to exist.
All I can say to those companies is "bye bye", I'm off to buy from someone else.
Posted by devans00 | August 16, 2011 2:29 PM
Lynn Schmelzer, thanks for the catch. Fixed.
Blog post on #!*&@ spellcheck coming soon.
Ed Cone
Editor
Baselinemag.com
Posted by Ed Cone | August 17, 2011 10:44 AM